 |
Posts Tagged ‘supply chain’
Thursday, April 15th, 2010
The article below looks at several aspects that should be considered when doing a cloud or SaaS software or services evaluation. These principles are best practices and are part of the overall selection methodology.
Analyst Insight:
SaaS and new enterprise software offerings have created a new dynamic for enterprise software selection as opposed to traditional software selection. The cloud evaluation process for software and services must consist of different and a more focused approach including such factors as; importance of methodology, model differentiation, industry specific expertise and total cost of ownership.
Importance of a methodology
A key technique to reduce risk, achieve roi, reduce risk of implementation failure and aligning business needs with organizational requirements is to have a software selection methodology in place. All of these benefits can be realized by how effective your evaluation was, if not executed properly spells disaster. A method that provides consistent results enables you to assess differentiation between vendors early in the evaluation process.
Model Differentiation
SaaS has spawned several new models of software billing. It is imperative that organizations know the different types of models they are evaluating and the nuances they contain. Organizations must realize the difference between SaaS, hybrid, hosted and in-house and any combinations thereof. The main differentiators are data, who owns it, how it is administered, stored and security of private, public, semi-private clouds and understanding the implementation implications that each factors will cause.
Industry Specific Expertise
Now more than ever this has become more important to organizations for cloud evaluation. Strategic size, fit, vertical industry expertise and similarities to existing clients should become areas of focus within the selection. Vendor specific infrastructure, architecture and support will help predict reliability if they will offer a good cloud product. Look for software that can adapt to changing business models rapidly and the vendor’s past history in delivery of the solution.
Total Cost of Ownership
To compare an in-house application to a SaaS model requires measurable metrics that can be ascertained from the system. Issues such as variables of time for the solution, current licenses, future licensing costs, data administration, storage costs, network management, integration costs to existing systems, support costs per year and consequent years and sometimes buyback should be heavily scrutinized.
The Outlook
These four areas have changed the way software is purchased and sold. Once too costly applications were a barrier of entry for smaller companies to compete, now SaaS can assist in profitability and enable rapid growth. The differences between an in-house and SaaS evaluations are subtle but yet enough to disrupt your business if the incorrect selection is made – so pay close attention.
Eval-Source has recently released a cloud evaluation and benchmarking processes using our Tru-Eval and Tru-Benchmark methods. As experts in software evaluation we are truly geared to help your organization find the right fit for your organization. Feel free to give us a call if you are doing any type of software evaluation or even to augment an on-premises system with cloud software or services.
Tags: analyst insight, cloud, DaaS, disparate systems, enterprise infrastructure, ERP, evaluation, infrastructure architecture, ROI, SaaS, SCRM, selection, services evaluation, social media, software, software offerings, software selection, supply chain, traditional vendors Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
Monday, March 29th, 2010
As companies have struggled through these past couple of years one thing has become apparent that is supply chain visibility has become prevalent than ever before. Supply chain analytics has become important for businesses to monitor and adapt their business priorities and models to readjust forecasts and adjust to demand. Whether it is a push or pull model as companies employ inventory strategy has changed to become a pull model rather than the problematic forecasting that the traditional pull model imposes.
Many C-Level executives are breaking their silence as to how they are getting through this rough time. As stated by Jim Butts, Sr. VP of Transportation at CH Robinson from his perspective the companies that have survived the recession best generally had four attributes: highly variable cost structures; cultures that focused on being very close to customers; strong, active supply chain leadership; and the ability to embrace change more so than competitors economic time. These four attributes points to backbone of many systems out there but do they supply the business intelligence needs of the organization to have the visibility they are looking for ?
Looking at these four areas from a systems standpoint brings to light that a system must have components of business process agility and visibility, financials, customer service and supply chain analytics. These functions can be processed through an enterprise performance management solution using dashboards. A system that can unite the data from several systems or aggregate from one central system is a valuable tool to gain insight into your business. Dashboards that can be catered to individual users with useable data from their own tasks and functions can empower employees to become more productive by making better decisions, becoming more efficient and have access to real-time data for customer service is invaluable.
These systems cover the business intelligence provided by operations, finance, IT, customer service, marketing and all other departments within your organization. A good BI software should include data aggregation from business processes, workflows, workcells, inventory status of everything in plans, replenishment, work in progress, in-transit inventory, inventory already on order, and lead time queries, central or dispersed databases, labor management, operational KPI’s, multiple systems, the ability to unite multiple technologies, possibly cloud capable, an easy to use interface, sales information, non-technical query building for non-technical personnel, department independent capabilities with individual or group security rights to name a few.
If an organization selects this type of flexible BI tool enables the organization to have the ability to make decisions quicker and embrace change because of readily available information be it good or bad but the ability to adapt to that change is the key decision making process that your competitor may not make make which will put you ahead of your competition. It is these companies who have embraced change to rapidly adapt to changing conditions that are showing profitability.
A line told to me from one of our customers “In business you don’t know what you don’t know about your business” He was referring to a supply chain system he had put in to monitor supply, control replenishment, track waste, monitor inventory, control costs from procurement and monitor supplier quality and bidding cycles. Once the system was implemented and the dashboards were set up the information he was able to aggregate from his system into how his business was working “The results floored me, as to what was going on ” he said, when we started to analyze the data. By understanding what his business was doing this particular customer saved over 36% of cost overruns and gained a 29% more profitability by reusing and accounting for unused material and better sourcing practices. This particular customer actually customized yachts and sold shipbuilding materials for yachts. The new found insight allowed him to change his business processes and become efficient than what he was doing previously.
As can be seen, there are no magic bullets for how BI can change your business but the available solutions can accommodate what ever you are trying to track or fix. But if someone were to give you tools to assist you in your business wouldn’t it be worth a look to see how you can improve its performance ?
Feel free to leave a comment and follow us on twitter http://www.twitter.com/eval_source and be sure to share the Eval-Source blog if you find it interesting.
Tags: business, Business intelligence, c level, chain, cloud, customer, customer service marketing, dashboard, database, enterprise performance management, enterprise systems, inventory, inventory strategy, Jim Butts, manufacturing, performance management solutions, real-time data, Robinson, social media, supply, supply chain, supply chain analytics, supply chain visibility, system, workflows Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
Monday, March 8th, 2010
As software vendors try to capture new customers, increase functionality and increase revenue a factor they may overlooked is not the competition from other vendors but a new type of industry push thats seems to have penetrating unsuspecting vendors.
While competition exists from competitors vendors may overlook a threat of diminishing market share from specialized industry companies starting to make a foray into the software enterprise market. Companies that are well established and within their industry and are market leaders have now started to expand their business portfolio by adding enterprise software to their specialized services.
Examples of this are manufacturers or suppliers that have a proprietary process or processes that special software was developed to manage these new processes. These companies have perfected the software to such a custom degree it essentially is the only software of the type or so specialized it serves a specific niche industry. By creating this software these companies are now turning around and selling their innovation as a software to competitors and the industry itself.
The major advantage that this brings for these companies is they have already built and proven industry expertise which brings instant credibility to their offering. These newly created divisions of traditional companies which now include software and services do not have to convince customers that they are vertical experts.
The threat is that traditional software vendors may underestimate the possible market erosion that this may pose to a finite market. Since more experienced players within the industry enters software traditional vendors may have a harder time to convince potential customers. This will lead to additional scrutiny within the purchasing process of software selection. This is a common play among manufacturing companies that divest to software. Companies within the aerospace and defense industries have more adopted this model and has stemmed very specialized software.
Other industries are following their lead in divestiture by doing the same thing. Logistics companies that move freight, handle 3PL services, transportation services, customs handling and regulation management, demand planning and warehouse operations has seen a move to this direction also. An example of this is UPS has already a supply chain practice consisting of software selection, integration and implementation. Following the trend is Menlo Logistics a worldwide logistics handler is now offering their own Warehouse Management System as software to be sold separately and assembly will be required. Meaning that the customizations, integration, installation and support will be available for post implementation. Incidentally companies such as Menlo will eventually offer support and maintenance for their system.
Vendors must arm themselves to counter this new threat of market erosion by innovation and winning customers with efficiency, value for the buck and offer superior customer service. In which they already have the edge with the experience of being a software vendor. Quick takeaway – not a threat to be taken lightly.
Tags: business portfolio, finite market, increase, industry, manufacturing, market, market erosion, niche industry, software, software selection, software vendors, suppliers, supply chain, threat, traditional software vendors, traditional vendors, warehouse management Posted in 3PL | 3 Comments »
|
|
|
|