Posts Tagged ‘traditional vendors’

Software Evaluation For SaaS or Cloud Computing

Thursday, April 15th, 2010

The article below looks at several aspects that should be considered when doing a cloud or SaaS software or services evaluation.   These principles are best practices and are part of the overall selection methodology.

Analyst Insight:

SaaS and new enterprise software offerings have created a new dynamic for enterprise software selection as opposed to traditional software selection.   The cloud evaluation process for software and services must consist of different and a more focused approach including such factors as; importance of methodology, model differentiation, industry specific expertise and total cost of ownership.

Importance of a methodology

A key technique to reduce risk, achieve roi, reduce risk of implementation failure and aligning business needs with organizational requirements is to have a software selection methodology in place.  All of these benefits can be realized by how effective your evaluation was, if not executed properly spells disaster.  A method that provides consistent results enables you to assess differentiation between vendors early in the evaluation process.

Model Differentiation

SaaS has spawned several new models of software billing.  It is imperative that organizations know the different types of models they are evaluating and the nuances they contain. Organizations must realize the difference between SaaS, hybrid, hosted and in-house and any combinations thereof.  The main differentiators are data, who owns it, how it is administered, stored and security of private, public, semi-private clouds and understanding the implementation implications that each factors will cause.

Industry Specific Expertise

Now more than ever this has become more important to organizations for cloud evaluation.  Strategic size, fit, vertical industry expertise and similarities to existing clients should become areas of focus within the selection.  Vendor specific infrastructure, architecture and support will help predict reliability if they will offer a good cloud product.  Look for software that can adapt to changing business models rapidly and the vendor’s past history in delivery of the solution.

Total Cost of Ownership

To compare an in-house application to a SaaS model requires measurable metrics that can be ascertained from the system.  Issues such as variables of time for the solution, current licenses, future licensing costs, data administration, storage costs, network management, integration costs to existing systems, support costs per year and consequent years and sometimes buyback should be heavily scrutinized.

The Outlook

These four areas have changed the way software is purchased and sold.  Once too costly applications were a barrier of entry for smaller companies to compete, now SaaS can assist in profitability and enable rapid growth.  The differences between an in-house and SaaS evaluations are subtle but yet enough to disrupt your business if the incorrect selection is made – so pay close attention.

Eval-Source has recently released a cloud evaluation and benchmarking processes using our Tru-Eval and Tru-Benchmark methods.   As experts in software evaluation we are truly geared to help your organization find the right fit for your organization.  Feel free to give us a call if you are doing any type of software evaluation or even to augment an on-premises system with cloud software or services.

  • Share/Bookmark

The Future of cloud computing for SMB !

Thursday, March 18th, 2010

The advent of cloud computing has most vendors offering their software service, which is great for consumers. Finally the consumer has some choice without heavy upfront capital expenditure.

There are service companies which offer professional services within the cloud, vendors that offer SaaS and vendors that offer both. The combination vendors that offer a platform, applications, typical IT services, integration, hosted and professional services are poised to capture more of the market a lot quicker than the traditional vendors that just offer software.

With MS offering its services in the cloud with the pending release of Office 2010 later in the year and the possibility to have other MS products such as email, CRM, and Sharepoint within cloud offer a significant advantage to MS. The reason for this is because DaaS (desktop as a service) is not far behind. This will include the addition of the latest and greatest computer operating systems such as Windows 7.0 for all the office computers. MS is poised to have a complete SMB offering in the cloud. Imagine an SMB that can get DaaS for multiple users from all different locations, lower IT costs, minimal administration if any with full MS Office Integration including the CRM and Sharepoint capabilities and even a Dynamics ERP thrown in to offer fully MS run shop for your SMB – pretty compelling argument.

Threats to this models already exist from other vendors like Salesforce, Zoho, Google and others that are offering additional applications around the CRM and rapidly turning it into a new landscape with endless customer choice. With vendors like Oracle’s new Cloud Office offering and its acquisition of Sun the open standards will play a more important part of its integration capabilities to play nice with other apps and vendors, if Oracle should continue down that path.

Other vendors have stepped up their game and even acquired software to offer the same type of vision. Google recently bought Doc Verse which allows users to collaborate, edit share Word, Excel and Powerpoint in real time mode over the web before MS. Since the release of Chrome as browser Google has served notice to the market that a Chrome OS is on the way. This means Google will now offer, an OS, browser, email, analytics, blogging platform, communication features (in the form of Google Messenger) and applications in the form of Google Docs which is now fully compatible with MS OFFICE due to the acquisition of Doc Verse and if you were to plug in a CRM and or Accounting application again – pretty compelling to look at if you are an SMB. All from one vendor a simple point of contact – which is pretty neat from a customer point of view.

It seems that other vendors have caught on to this and are following the leaders. IBM offers a lot of the same type of products and services in the cloud and has solidified its commitment to the cloud by offering Lotus Live iNotes and also IBM Lotus Symphony which happens to be free (a decent MS Office substitute).
Additional vendors are entering this marketplace such as little known players like Evermore Software – a Chinese company in Wuxi province. This vendor offers an Office like suite to rival MS Office for half the price, similar look and feel of Office and is even starting to offer this in the cloud.

As the market demands more of cloud based applications new vendors will challenge the traditional and big players to not only keep up but force them to innovate to stay ahead of the game. Bottom line more consumer choice, easier market entry for SMB’s and may the best vendor win.

  • Share/Bookmark

Software vendors beware – there are new kids on the block

Monday, March 8th, 2010

As software vendors try to capture new customers,  increase functionality and increase revenue a factor they may overlooked is not the competition from other vendors but a new type of industry push thats seems to have penetrating unsuspecting vendors.

While competition exists from competitors vendors may overlook a threat of diminishing market share from specialized industry companies starting to make a foray into the software enterprise market.   Companies that are well established and within their industry and are market leaders have now started to expand their business portfolio by adding enterprise software to their specialized services.

Examples of this are manufacturers or suppliers that have a proprietary process or processes that special software was developed to manage these new processes.  These companies have perfected the software to such a custom degree it essentially is the only software of the type or so specialized it serves a specific niche industry.  By creating this software these companies are now turning around  and selling their innovation as a software to competitors and the industry itself.

The major advantage that this brings for these companies is they have already built and proven industry expertise which brings instant credibility to their offering. These newly created divisions of traditional companies which now include software and services do not have to convince customers that they are vertical experts.

The threat is that traditional software vendors may underestimate the possible market erosion that this may pose to a finite market. Since more experienced players within the industry enters software traditional vendors may have a harder time to convince potential customers. This will lead to additional scrutiny within the purchasing process of software selection. This is a common play among manufacturing companies that divest to software. Companies within the aerospace and defense industries have more adopted this model and has stemmed very specialized software.

Other industries are following their lead in divestiture by doing the same thing. Logistics companies that move freight, handle 3PL services, transportation services, customs handling and regulation management, demand planning and warehouse operations has seen a move to this direction also. An example of this is UPS has already a supply chain practice consisting of software selection, integration and implementation. Following the trend is Menlo Logistics a worldwide logistics handler is now offering their own Warehouse Management System as software to be sold separately and assembly will be required. Meaning that the customizations, integration, installation and support will be available for post implementation. Incidentally companies such as Menlo will eventually offer support and maintenance for their system.

Vendors must arm themselves to counter this new threat of market erosion by innovation and winning customers with efficiency, value for the buck and offer superior customer service. In which they already have the edge with the experience of being a software vendor. Quick takeaway – not a threat to be taken lightly.

  • Share/Bookmark